INTRO
(Scroll down to skip to the arguments for Prop F & I.)
I’ve lived in San Francisco since 2008. Some of the reasons my partner and I moved here included the culture of acceptance, diversity, good food, queer scene, and natural beauty. We love this city. It gave us a fresh start on life, free of the harsh Boston winters we fled. We arrived with very little money but we had a good friend who lived in a big house with an extra room. The rent was cheap. the Asian food nearby was delicious. Golden Gate Park was right next door. It was a classic San Francisco setup: 3 trans guys, 2 lesbians, some dogs, and us. Eventually my partner and I were ready to move in together without roommates. We found a pet friendly, affordable, rent-controlled apartment in Fox Plaza at Civic Center.
Over the years we saw the city changing, and over the past three years, especially, that change has accelerated at an alarming rate. All around our building shiny new condo buildings have popped up. The rent for newcomers to Fox Plaza is double what it was, reminding us to be eternally grateful for our rent-control.Twitter got a multi-million dollar tax cut to move in across the street. The divey restaurants like the Chinese takeout place gave way to fancy new ones like Alta. Several gay bars within walking distance have been sold and are now artisan cocktail bars featuring tired, trendy decor of reclaimed wooden bar stools and exposed-wire lightbulbs. (Note to new bars: Enough with the bird names and old-timey decor!)
The nonprofit organization I once worked for, like many others, could no longer afford the rent in San Francisco and moved to Oakland. Knowing that in order to stay in San Francisco – and maybe, just maybe not live in a studio apartment anymore – we would need to grow our careers, my husband quit his job and underwent a 4 month tech marketing bootcamp. He works for an app now.
I wouldn’t be angry about all these changes if I didn’t have a deep love of San Francisco and what this city means to so many of us.
I believe we can save what is left of the beautiful diversity that makes San Francisco special and still have some fancy restaurants, tech companies, and high-end coffee right alongside our nonprofits and family run businesses, if we put our minds together.
I am not anti-tech. I love innovation. I was an early adopter of the internet and began building web-based businesses (They were about pets. I was young.) in the mid/late-nineties.
I’m not anti-development. I support Prop D because it will allow for the development of a park and housing, 40% of which will be “affordable.” (If we can get 40% affordable near ATT&T park, what can we get elsewhere when we fight for it?!)
What I’m “anti” is greed and unfairness. That’s why I’m supporting Propositions F and I.
PROP F
Proposition F is a commonsense set of regulations to ensure our neighborhoods are not turned into hotels.
I think Airbnb is a cool concept. I’ve used it before. I think people who go on vacation should be able to rent out their home and make a few bucks, but I do not think people, especially big businesses, should be able to gobble up our precious real estate, including rent-controlled units, and run illegal mini hotels out of them.
The incentive for landlords to rent out their units on airbnb and make big bucks is too great, and the current law is too flawed. It was written in-part by Airbnb and has been called “unenforceable” by many of our own city officials. Less than 10% of short-term rental hosts have registered with the city.
Airbnb’s $8million dollar campaign against Proposition F is full of misleading ideas. The notion that your neighbors will hire a lawyer and launch a lawsuit against you for letting grandma sleep in your house while you are away is absolute hogwash. Anyone can sue anyone in America, for sure, but lawyers often won’t take on frivolous lawsuits and judges often drop them, too.
The new law would still allow people to rent out a room in their home for up to 75 days a year. That’s a lot!
We’re in the middle of a crisis in which many people have been evicted or are under threat of being evicted by landlords who want to raise the rent or flip their units into short-term rentals. Folks, we’ve got to reign this in. Other cities around the world, from Santa Monica to Barcelona have already passed their own versions of regulations, and many more are sure to follow suit.
Everything in Prop F is common in other American laws and regulations. It’s one of the important tools in the toolbox we’ll need to save existing affordable housing.
PROP I
Prop I would put a temporary moratorium on new housing construction in the Mission unless it is 100% affordable.
In order to find yourself at YES for Prop I, you’ll need to recognize the reality of hyper-gentrification and how it is caused. Opponents of Prop I will argue that building more condos in the Mission will bring housing prices down because “supply/demand.”
That argument is flawed and way too simplistic to address the complexity of the housing crisis.
It’s just not possible to build the number of units (100k?) in a short enough amount of time it would take to really bring down rents and also maintain San Francisco’s diversity. On top of that, if you did plunk down 100k units onto SF, this place would be excruciatingly sterile.
When a new condo building is erected or an old factory becomes fancy condos and they are subsequently marketed to the wealthy, it creates an influx of wealthy people into the neighborhood. Soon enough, the nearby landlords give in to the temptation to evict the family-run burrito joint and raise the rent to the point where only, say, a fancy coffee company can open in its place. As the neighborhood shifts, like I saw happen in Civic Center as all the new towers went up, it gets whiter and richer. This makes the neighborhood even more “desirable” to other rich people, and the home values and rents go up, not down, because of the new upscale supply. More people are evicted, more can’t afford to stay, and the process intensifies.
This process has already displaced thousands of poor and working-class Latino families in the Mission. When poor families are displaced from San Francisco it can be devastating to them. In the Mission there are centralized community resources – from immigration assistance to health care – available that may not be available in other area cities. We are also a sanctuary city, which for many families is extremely important for holding them together.
Admittedly, this type of gentrification is but one part of the problem. We live in the Bay Area, which is chock-full of high paying jobs and has always been a very desirable place to live. San Francisco does have limited land, too, so ultimately the housing crisis is one that will need to be solved with a multi-pronged, multi-regional approach – preferably one that looks at how to create housing for mixed income communities along public transit.
The Mission moratorium is important because it could slow the hyper-gentrification and displacement and give the city time to create a new plan to acquire some of the available lots of land in the Mission which could be developed for people of mixed incomes. It’s a pause. It’s a breather. And we need it.
Don’t let big real estate and Airbnb buy off our local politicians and our city. Vote Yes on F & I.